Airport operator’s involvement in groundhandling - (Source: SH&E Limited, October 2002)
Airport
|
Does the airport operator provide handling services?
|
Does this distort competition?
|
Is there a separate entity to offer handling services?
|
Do you think there is any form of cross subsidisation?
|
How is the separation of accounts safeguarded (according to airport operator)?
|
Paris-Orly
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
ADP separated its accounts before the Directive came into force. ADP accountants are responsible for the separation of accounts.
|
Marseille-Provence
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Bordeaux-Mérignac
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Strasbourg-Entzheim
|
Yes
|
Aviapartner: Yes
|
No
|
|
CAA responsible for checking the separation of accounts.
|
Berlin-Schönefeld
|
Yes
|
|
No
|
|
|
Berlin-Tegel
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Meeting of shareholders and board of directors
|
Hahn
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Use of certified accountant
|
Dusseldorf
|
Yes
|
AUC: Yes, high market share and long term contracts
|
Yes
|
AUC: Yes, suggestion
|
Own profit centre and separation of revenue and costs. Safeguarded by finance department and controlling system, also checked by the AUC.
|
Hannover-Langenhagen
|
Yes
|
Hannover ground aviation service: No
|
Yes
|
Hannover Ground Aviation Service: No
|
By CAA
|
Leipzig-Halle
|
Yes
|
PortGround: No
|
Yes
|
ProtGround: No
|
Separate investment
|
Köln-Bonn
|
Yes
|
AUC: Yes
|
Yes
|
AUC: Unknown
|
Separate business unit (profit centre), checked by independent accountant
|
Shannon
|
Yes
|
|
Yes
|
|
Direct revenues and costs are allocated to the individual business area. Indirect costs are apportioned based on the outputs of a cost attribution model. Checked by external auditors.
|
Torino-Caselle
|
Yes
|
Sagat: No
|
Yes
|
|
Different companies
|
Porto-Sà Carneiro
|
Yes
|
PGA: Yes
|
Yes
|
PGA: Probably
|
|
Alicante
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Bilbao
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Gran Canaria
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Ibiza
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Lanzarote
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Malaga
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Menorca
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Sevilla
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Göteborg-Landvetter
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
London-Gatwick
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
London-Stansted
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Luton
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Newcastle
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Aberdeen
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Bristol
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Edinburgh
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Glasgow
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
ANNEX G
Centralised infrastructure - (Source: SH&E Limited, October 2002)
Airport
|
CI defined
|
Charging Base
|
Users consulted?
|
Problems
|
Paris-Orly
|
Yes
|
Cost related
|
Yes
|
No
|
Marseille-Provence
|
Yes
|
Number of passengers and usage
|
No
|
No
|
Bâle-Mulhouse
|
Yes
|
No separate charges
|
Yes
|
No
|
Strasbourg-Entzheim
|
Yes
|
Covered by passenger security charge
|
Yes
|
No
|
Berlin-Schönefeld
|
Yes
|
Based on number of passengers, MTOW or usage
|
Yes
|
No
|
Berlin-Tegel
|
Yes
|
Parts are covered by aeronautical charges and the access fee, other elements based on number of passengers and MTOW
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Hahn
|
Yes
|
Cost related
|
Yes
|
No
|
Dusseldorf
|
Yes
|
Cost related
|
Yes
|
Yes, Aviapartner notes the airport has put as much price to CI (see Section 4)
|
Hannover-Langenhagen
|
Yes
|
Usage related
|
Yes
|
Yes, Aviapartner notes the airport has put as much price to CI (see Section 4)
Hannover ground aviation service: No
|
Leipzig-Halle
|
Yes
|
Cost related
|
Yes
|
Yes, AUC noted there is insufficient information about CI
|
Köln-Bonn
|
Yes
|
Based on aircraft type
|
Yes
|
Yes, Aviapartner notes the airport has put as much price to CI (see Section 4)
|
Shannon
|
No
|
No charges
|
|
|
Torino-Caselle
|
Yes
|
Based on number of passengers and ATMs
|
Yes
|
No
|
Porto-Sà Carneiro
|
No
|
No charges
|
|
|
Alicante
|
Yes
|
Movement basis
|
No
|
|
Bilbao
|
Yes
|
Movement basis
|
No
|
|
Gran Canaria
|
Yes
|
Movement basis
|
No
|
|
Ibiza
|
Yes
|
Movement basis
|
No
|
|
Lanzarote
|
Yes
|
Movement basis
|
No
|
|
Malaga
|
Yes
|
Movement basis
|
No
|
|
Sevilla
|
Yes
|
Movement basis
|
No
|
|
Göteborg-Landvetter
|
Yes
|
Based on number of passengers and ATMs
|
No
|
Yes, according to the AUC there were problems with regard to the definition of Ground Power Unit and remote parking
|
London-Gatwick
|
No
|
No charges
|
|
|
London-Stansted
|
Yes
|
Parts are covered by aeronautical charges and other elements are cost related
|
Yes
|
Yes, according to ASIG at other airports where oil companies own the facilities, there is difficulty for other fuel suppliers to gain access to the final storage facility.
|
Luton
|
Yes
|
No set formula at present
|
Yes
|
No
|
Newcastle
|
Yes
|
Depending on usage
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Aberdeen
|
No
|
No charges
|
|
|
Edinburgh
|
No
|
No charges
|
|
|
Glasgow
|
No
|
No charges
|
|
|
ANNEX H
Changes in social aspects and training - (Source: SH&E Limited, October 2002)
Airport
|
Airport operator
|
AUC
|
Ground handler
|
|
Change in social aspects?
|
Change in training standards/
education level?
|
Change in social aspects?
|
Change in training standards/
education level?
|
Change in social aspects?
|
Change in training standards/
education level?
|
Paris-Orly
|
Yes
|
No
|
|
|
Cariane:
No
|
Cariane:
No
|
Marseille-Provence
|
No
|
No
|
Difficult to evaluate
|
No
|
|
|
Bâle-Mulhouse
|
|
|
|
|
Swissport:
Yes, very restrictive salary increases
|
Swissport:
Yes, training reduced to minimum
|
Bordeaux-Mérignac
|
Yes, Strikes
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
Strasbourg-Entzheim
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Aviapartner:
Yes, frozen salaries
|
Avipartner:
No
|
Berlin-Schönefeld
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
Berlin-Tegel
|
N/a
|
N/a
|
|
|
|
|
Hahn
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
Dusseldorf
|
Yes, more flexible working time, lower wages
|
No
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Aviapartner:
Yes, gain in productivity
|
Aviapartner:
No
|
Hannover-Langenhagen
|
|
|
|
|
Aviapartner:
Yes, gain in productivity
Hannover Aviation Ground Service: Yes
|
Aviapartner:
No
Hannover Aviation Ground Service: No
|
Leipzig-Halle
|
Yes, new labour contract
|
No
|
Yes
|
No
|
PortGround:
Yes, new labour contract
|
PortGround:
No
|
Köln-Bonn
|
Yes, fewer full time jobs, lower entrance salary
|
No
|
No
|
No
|
Aviapartner:
Yes, gain in productivity
|
Aviapartner:
No
|
Shannon
|
No
|
Yes, more input by airport authority in terms of audit/review of training
|
|
|
|
|
Torino-Caselle
|
|
|
|
|
Sagat:
Yes, increase of temporary and part-time contracts, decrease in salaries
|
Sagat:
No
|
Porto-Sà Carneiro
|
No comment
|
Yes, more training
|
|
|
PGA:
Unkonwn
|
PGA:
Unkonwn
|
Alicante
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bilbao
|
|
|
|
|
Iberia:
No
|
Iberia:
No
|
Gran Canaria
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ibiza
|
|
|
|
|
Ineuropa:
Yes, improved
|
Ineuropa:
Yes, improved
|
Lanzarote
|
|
|
|
|
Nordic:
N/A
|
Nordic: N/A
|
Göteborg-Landvetter
|
|
|
Yes, more staff on temporary contracts
|
Yes, due to external rules and regulations
|
|
|
London-Gatwick
|
No evidence
|
No evidence
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
London-Stansted
|
None
|
Yes, incorrect use of equipment
|
|
|
ASIG:
No
|
ASIG:
Yes, airport company showing greater focus and actively encouraging operators to work with them
|
Luton
|
Yes, movement of labour
|
Yes, continuity of standards
|
|
|
|
|
Newcastle
|
No
|
No
|
|
|
Servisair:
No
|
Servisair:
Yes, better
|
Aberdeen
|
Yes, high employee turnover rate
|
Yes, improved due to joint training initiatives on the ramp
|
|
|
Servisair:
Yes, lower salaries to compete in market
|
Servisair:
Yes, market requirements
|
Bristol
|
Yes, job security
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edinburgh
|
Yes, more temporary employee contracts
|
Yes, more structured training and manuals
|
Yes
|
Yes
|
Aviance:
No
Servisair:
Yes, ability to attract calibre of staff required diminished against inability to pay appriate salaries
|
Aviance:
Yes, more demands of hasher training from airlines
Servisair:
Yes, NVQs to attract employees against competitive market – more multi-functional training to reduce cost
|
Glasgow
|
|
Yes, better
|
|
|
Airline Services:
No
Aviance:
No
Servisair:
Yes, salaries kept low in order to compete in market
Execair:
No
|
Airline Services:
No
Aviance:
Yes, setting up of a training department
Servisair:
Yes, more multi-functional training
Execair:
Nol
|
ANNEX I
Сподели с приятели: |
