Facilities/RVR (Note 5) Decision
height
(Note 7) Full
(Notes
1&6)
Interm.
(Notes2&6)
Basic
(Notes
3&6)
Nil
(Notes
4&6)
200 ft 550 m 700 m 800 m 1 000 m
201–250 ft 600 m 700 m 800 m 1 000 m
251–300 ft 650 m 800 m 900 m 1 200 m
301 ft
and above
800 m 900 m 1 000 m 1 200 m
Note 1: Full facilities comprise runway markings, 720 m
or more of HI/MI approach lights, runway edge
lights, threshold lights and runway end lights.
Lights must be on.
Note 2: Intermediate facilities comprise runway
markings, 420–719 m of HI/MI approach lights,
runway edge lights, threshold lights and runway
end lights. Lights must be on.
Note 3: Basic facilities comprise runway markings,
<420 m of HI/MI approach lights, any length of
LI approach lights, runway edge lights,
threshold lights and runway end lights. Lights
must be on.
Note 4: Nil approach light facilities comprise runway
markings, runway edge lights, threshold lights,
runway end lights or no lights at all.
Note 5: The above figures are either the reported RVR
or meteorological visibility converted to RVR in
accordance with paragraph (h).
Note 6: The Table is applicable to conventional
approaches with a glide slope angle up to and
including 4¡.
Note 7: The DH mentioned in the Table 5 refers to the
initial calculation of DH. When selecting theassociated RVR, there is no need to take
account of a rounding up to the nearest ten feet,
which may be done for operational purposes,
(e.g. conversion to DA).
(5) Single pilot operations. For single
pilot operations, an operator must calculate the minimum RVR for all approaches in accordance with JAR–OPS 1.430 and this Appendix. An RVR
of less than 800 m is not permitted except when using a suitable autopilot coupled to an ILS or
MLS, in which case normal minima apply. The Decision Height applied must not be less than
1·25 x the minimum use height for the autopilot.
(6) Night operations. For night operations
at least runway edge, threshold and runway end lights must be on.
(d) Precision approach – Category II
operations
(1) General. A Category II operation is a
precision instrument approach and landing using
ILS or MLS with:
(i) A decision height below 200 ft
but not lower than 100 ft; and
(ii) A runway visual range of not
less than 300 m.
(2) Decision Height. An operator must
ensure that the decision height for a Category II
operation is not lower than:
(i) The minimum decision height
specified in the AFM, if stated;
(ii) The minimum height to which
the precision approach aid can be used
without the required visual reference;
(iii) The OCH/OCL for the category
of aeroplane;(iv) The decision height to which
the flight crew is authorised to operate; or
(v) 100 ft.
(3) Visual reference. A pilot may not
continue an approach below the Category II
decision height determined in accordance with
sub-paragraph (d)(2) above unless visual
reference containing a segment of at least 3
consecutive lights being the centre line of the
approach lights, or touchdown zone lights, or
runway centre line lights, or runway edge lights,
or a combination of these is attained and can be
maintained. This visual reference must include a
lateral element of the ground pattern, i.e. an
approach lighting crossbar or the landing
threshold or a barette of the touchdown zone
lighting.
(4) Required RVR. The lowest minima to
be used by an operator for Category II operations
are:
Table 6 – RVR for Cat II approach vs DH
Category II minima
Auto-coupled to below DH
(Note 1)
Decision height
RVR/Aeroplane
Category A, B & C
RVR/Aeroplane
Category D
100 ft–120 ft 300 m 300 m
(Note 2)/350 m
121 ft–140 ft 400 m 400 m
141 ft and above 450 m 450 m
Note 1: The reference to ‘auto-coupled to below DH’ in
this table means continued use of the automatic
flight control system down to a height which is
not greater than 80% of the applicable DH. Thus
airworthiness requirements may, through
minimum engagement height for the automaticflight control system, affect the DH to be
applied.
Note 2: 300 m may be used for a Category D aeroplane
conducting an autoland.
(e) Precision approach – Category III
operations
(1) General. Category III operations are
subdivided as follows:
(i)Category III A operations. A precision instrument approach and landing using ILS or MLS with: (A) A decision height lower than 100 ft; and (B) A runway visual range not less than 200 m.
(ii) Category III B operations. A
precision instrument approach and landing
using ILS or MLS with:
(A)A decision height lower than 50 ft, or no decision height; and
(B) A runway visual range lower than 200 m but not less than 75 m
Note: Where the decision height (DH) and runway visual range (RVR) do not fall within the same Category, the RVR will determine in which Category the operation is to be considered.
(2) Decision Height. For operations in
which a decision height is used, an operator must ensure that the decision height is not lower than:
(i) The minimum decision height
specified in the AFM, if stated;
(ii) The minimum height to which
the precision approach aid can be used
without the required visual reference; or
(iii) The decision height to which
the flight crew is authorised to operate.
(3) No Decision Height Operations.
Operations with no decision height may only be
conducted if:
(i) The operation with no decision
height is authorised in the AFM;
(ii) The approach aid and the
aerodrome facilities can support operations
with no decision height; and
(iii) The operator has an approval
for CAT III operations with no decision
height.
Note: In the case of a CAT III runway it may be assumed that operations with no decision height can be supported unless specifically restricted as published in the AIP or NOTAM.
(4) Visual reference
(i) For Category IIIA operations,
and for Category IIIB operations with failpassive flight control systems, a pilot may
not continue an approach below the
decision height determined in accordance
with sub-paragraph (e)(2) above unless a
visual reference containing a segment of at
least 3 consecutive lights being the centreline of the approach lights, or touchdown zone lights, or runway centreline lights, or runway edge lights, or a combination of these is attained and can be maintained.
(ii) For Category IIIB operations
with fail-operational flight control systems
using a decision height a pilot may not
continue an approach below the Decision
Height, determined in accordance with subparagraph (e)(2) above, unless a visual
reference containing at least one centreline
light is attained and can be maintained.
(iii) For Category III operations
with no decision height there is no
requirement for visual contact with the
runway prior to touchdown.
(5) Required RVR. The lowest minima to
be used by an operator for Category III operations
are:
Table 7 – RVR for Cat III approach vs.DH
and roll-out control/guidance system
Category III minima
Approach
Category
Decision
Height (ft.)
(Note 3)
Roll-out
Control/
Guidance
System
RVR (m.)
IIA Less than
100 ft
Not required 200 m
(Note 1)
IIIB Less than
100 ft
Fail-passive 150 m
(Notes 1& 2)
IIIB Less than
50 ft
Fail-passive 125 m
IIIB Less than
50 ft or No
Decision
Height
Failoperational
75 m
Note 1: For fail-passive operations see IEM to Appendix
1 to JAR-OPS 1.430, paragraph (e)(5). Crew
actions in case of autopilot failure at or below
decision height in fail-passive Category III
operations.
(f) Circling(1) The lowest minima to be used by an
operator for circling are
Table 8 – Visibility and MDH for circling vs.
aeroplane category
Aeroplane Category
A B C D
MDH 400 ft 500 ft 600 ft 700 ft
Minimum
meteorological
visibility
1 500 m 1 600 m 2 400 m 3 600 m
(2) Circling with prescribed tracks is an
accepted procedure within the meaning of this paragraph. (See IEM to Appendix 1 to JAR-OPS 1.430 (f)).
(g) Visual Approach. An operator shall not use
an RVR of less than 800 m for a visual approach.
(h) Conversion of Reported Meteorological
Visibility to RVR
(1) An operator must ensure that a
meteorological visibility to RVR conversion is not used for calculating take-off minima,
Category II or III minima or when a reported
RVR is available.
Note: If the RVR is reported as being above the maximum
value assessed by the aerodrome operator, e.g. “RVR more
than 1 500 metres”, it is not considered to be a reported
RVR in this context and the Conversion Table may be used
(2) When converting meteorological
visibility to RVR in all other circumstances than
those in sub-paragraph (h)(1) above, an operator
must ensure that the following Table is used:
Table 9 – Conversion of visibility to RVR Lighting elements
in operation
RVR= Reported Met.
Visibility xDay Night
HI approach and
runway lighting
1·5 2·0
Any type of lighting
installation other
than above
1·0 1·5
No lighting 1·0 Not
applicable
JAR-OPS 1.435 Terminology
(a) Terms used in this Subpart and not defined in JAR–1 have the following meaning: (1) Circling. The visual phase of an
instrument approach to bring an aircraft into
position for landing on a runway which is not
suitably located for a straight-in approach. (2) Low Visibility Procedures (LVP).
Procedures applied at an aerodrome for the
purpose of ensuring safe operations during
Category II and III approaches and Low Visibility Take-offs.
(3) Low Visibility Take-Off (LVTO). A
take-off where the Runway Visual Range (RVR) is less than 400 m.
4) Flight control system. A system
which includes an automatic landing system
and/or a hybrid landing system.
(5) Fail-Passive flight control system. A
flight control system is fail-passive if, in the event
of a failure, there is no significant out-of-trim
condition or deviation of flight path or attitude but
the landing is not completed automatically. For a
fail-passive automatic flight control system the
pilot assumes control of the aeroplane after a failure.
(6) Fail-Operational flight control
system. A flight control system is fail-operational
if, in the event of a failure below alert height, the
approach, flare and landing, can be completed
automatically. In the event of a failure, the
automatic landing system will operate as a fail failpassive
system
(7) Fail-operational hybrid landing
system. A system which consists of a primary
fail-passive automatic landing system and a
secondary independent guidance system enabling
the pilot to complete a landing manually after
failure of the primary system.
Note: A typical secondary independent guidance system
consists of a monitored head-up display providing
guidance which normally takes the form of command
information but it may alternatively be situation (or
deviation) information.
(8) Visual approach. An approach when
either part or all of an instrument approach procedure is not completed and the approach is executed with visual reference to the terrain.
JAR–OPS 1.440 Low visibility operations
General operating rules
(a) An operator shall not conduct Category II
or III operations unless:
(1) Each aeroplane concerned is
certificated for operations with decision heights below 200 ft, or no decision height, and equipped in accordance with JAR-AWO or an equivalent accepted by the Authority;
(2) A suitable system for recording
approach and/or automatic landing success and failure is established and maintained to monitor
the overall safety of the operation;
(3) The operations are approved by the
Authority;
(4) The flight crew consists of at least
2 pilots; and
(5) Decision Height is determined by
means of a radio altimeter.
(b) An operator shall not conduct low visibility take-offs in less than 150 m RVR (Category A, B
and C aeroplanes) or 200 m RVR (Category D aeroplanes) unless approved by the Authority.
JAR–OPS 1.445 Low visibility operations – Aerodrome considerations
(a) An operator shall not use an aerodrome for
Category II or III operations unless the aerodrome is approved for such operations by the State in which the aerodrome is located.
(b) An operator shall verify that Low Visibility Procedures (LVP) have been established, and will be
enforced, at those aerodromes where low visibility
operations are to be conducted.
JAR–OPS 1.450 Low visibility operations -Training and Qualifications
(a) An operator shall ensure that, prior to
conducting Low Visibility Take-Off, Category II and III operations:
(1) Each flight crew member:
(i) Completes the training and
checking requirements prescribed in
Appendix 1 including [Flight] Simulator
training in operating to the limiting values
of RVR and Decision Height appropriate to
the operator’s Category II/III approval; and
(ii) Is qualified in accordance with
Appendix 1;
(2) The training and checking is
conducted in accordance with a detailed syllabus approved by the Authority and included in the Operations Manual. This training is in addition to that prescribed in Subpart N; and
(3) The flight crew qualification is
specific to the operation and the aeroplane type.
JAR-OPS 1.455 Low visibility operations –Operating Procedures
(See Appendix 1 to JAR-OPS
1.455)
(a) An operator must establish procedures and
instructions to be used for Low Visibility Take-Off and Category II and III operations. These procedures must be included in the Operations Manual and contain the duties of flight crew members during taxying, take-off, approach, flare, landing, roll-out and missed approach as appropriate.
(b) The commander shall satisfy himself that:
(1) The status of the visual and non-visual
facilities is sufficient prior to commencing a Low Visibility Take-Off or a Category II or III approach;
(2) Appropriate LVPs are in force
according to information received from Air
Traffic Services, before commencing a Low
Visibility Take-off or a Category II or III
approach; and
(3) The flight crew members are properly
qualified prior to commencing a Low Visibility Take-off in an RVR of less than 150 m (Category A, B and C aeroplanes) or 200 m (Cat D aeroplanes) or a Category II or III approach.
JAR–OPS 1.460 Low visibility operations – Minimum equipment
(a) An operator must include in the Operations Manual the minimum equipment that has to be
serviceable at the commencement of a Low
Visibility Take-off or a Category II or III approach in accordance with the AFM or other approved
document.
(b) The commander shall satisfy himself that
the status of the aeroplane and of the relevant
airborne systems is appropriate for the specific operation to be conducted.
JAR–OPS 1.465 VFR Operating minima
(a) An operator shall ensure that:
(1) VFR flights are conducted in
accordance with the Visual Flight Rules and in accordance with the Table in Appendix 1 to JAR– OPS 1.465.
(2) Special VFR flights are not
commenced when the visibility is less than 3 km and not otherwise conducted when the visibility is less than 1·5 km.
Допълнение 2
Категории самолети – Полети при всякакво метеорологично време
(a)Класификация на самолетите
Критериите, които се взимат под внимание за класификация на самолетите по категории е определената въздушна скорост на прага на пистата (VAT), която е еквивалентна на скоростта на сриване (VSO) умножена по 1.3 или VSIG умножена по 1.23 в конфигурацията за кацане при максимална разрешена маса за кацане. Ако и двете VSO и VSIG са налични, трябва да се използва по-високо получената VAT. Категориите самолети съответстващи на VAT стойности са в таблицата по-долу:
Категория самолет VAT
А По-малко от 91 kt
Б От 91 до 120 kt
C От 121 до 140 kt
D От 141 до 165 kt
E От 166 до 210 kt
Конфигурацията за кацане, която се взима под внимание трябва да бъде определена от оператора или от производителя на самолета.
(b)Постояна промяна на категория (максимална маса за кацане).
(1)оператора може да наложи постоянна, по-ниска маса за кацане и да използва тази маса за определяне на VAT, ако е одобрено от Властите.
(2)Определената категория за даден самолет трябва да бъде постоянна величина и по този начин е независима от изменящите се всекидневно условия на експлоатации.
Допълнениe 1
Експлоатации при слаба видимост – Основни Правила за Експлоатация
(a)Общи положения. Следните процедури са приложими за въвеждане и одобрение на експлоатации при слаба видимост.
(b)Експлоатационна демонстрация. Целта на експлоатационната демонстрация e да определи или утвърди използването и ефективността на подходящите насочващи бордни системи, подготовка, схеми за изпълнение на полета от екипажа, програма за поддръжка и за одобрени инструкции приложими за програми за Категория II/III.
(1)Ако изискваното за DH e 50 ft или повече, най-малко 30 подхода за кацане и кацания трябва ада бъдат осъществени в експлоатации при които се използват системи Категория II/III, инсталирани във всеки летателен апарат. Ако DH е по-малко от 50 ft, най-малко 100 подхода за кацане и кацания трябва да бъдат изпълнени освен ако нещо друго не е одобрено от Властите.
(2)Ако оператора има различни варианти на един и същ летателен апарат, които използват една и съща основна система за управление на ЛА и системи на индикаторния дисплей, или имат различни система за управление на ЛА и системи на индикаторния дисплей на същия тип летателен апарат, оператора трябва да покаже, че разнообразните варианти имат задоволителна работа, като не е необходимо оператора да провежда експлоатационна демонстрация за всеки един вариант. Властите може също да приемат намаляване на броя на подходите за кацане и кацанията въз основа на уверение базирано на получения опита на друг оператор с AOC, издаден в съответствие с JAR-OPS 1, който използва същия тип или вариант самолети и процедури.
(1)Ако броя на неуспешните подходи за кацане надвишават 5 % от крайния им брой (напр. незадоволителни кацания, изключени системи), оценяващата програма трябва да бъде разширена със стъпки от по най-малко 10 подхода за кацане и кацания, докато цялостното ниво на неуспех не надвишава 5 %.
(i)Събиране на Данни за Експлоатационна демонстрация. Всеки кандидат трябва да разработи метод за събиране на данни (напр. форма, която да се използва от екипажа на полета) за да записва изпълнението на подхода за кацане и кацане. Получените данни и резюмето от демонстрационните данни трябва да бъде на разположение на Властите за оценка.
(ii)Анализ на Данните. Незадоволителните подходи за кацане и/или автоматичните кацания трябва да бъдат документирани и анализирани.
(ii)Непрекъснат Контрол:
(1)След получаването на първоначалното одобрение, експлоатациите трябва да бъдат контролирани непрекъснато от оператора за да се установят всякакви нежелани тенденции преди те да станат рисковани. Докладите на полетния екипаж могат да се използват за да се постигне това.
(2)Следната информация трябва да се пази за период от 12 месеца:
(i)Общият брой на подходи за кацане, от даден тип самолет, където оборудването за самолетна Категория ІІ или ІІІ е използвано да направи подходите за кацане успешни, действителни или практични с подходящата Категория ІІ или минимум ІІІ; и
(ii)Докладите от незадоволителните подходи за кацане и/или автоматични кацания, чрез регистрация на летища и самолети в следните категории:
(A)Дефект на самолетното оборудване;
(В) Затруднения с наземните съоръжения;
(С) Пропуснати подходи за кацане поради ATC инструкции; или
(D) Други причини.
(1)Оператора трябва да въведе процедура за контрол на работата на системите за автоматично кацане на всеки самолет.
(i)Преходни периоди
(1)Оператори без предишен опит в Категория ІІ или ІІІ
(i)Оператор без предишен експлоатационен опит в Категория ІІ или ІІІ може да бъде одобрен за Категория ІІ или ІІІА експлоатации, когато има минимум 6 месечен опит на Категория І експлоатации на типът самолети.
(ii)След завършване на 6 месеца на Категория ІІ или ІІІА експлоатации на типът самолети, операторът може да бъде одобрен за Категория ІІІВ експлоатации. Когато дават такова одобрение Властите могат наложат по-висок минимум в сравнение с най-ниските приложими за допълнителен период. Увеличаването на минимума обикновено се отнася за RVR и/или за ограничение срещу експлоатации без относителна височина за взимане на решения и трябва да бъде избрана такава, че няма да се изисква смяна от експлоатационните процедури. (1)Експлоатации с предишен опит в Категория ІІ и ІІІ. Оператор с предишен опит в Категория ІІ или ІІІ може да получи разрешение за намален преходен период чрез отправяне на искане към Властите.
(i)Поддържане оборудването на Категория ІІ, Категория ІІІ и LVTO. Инструкциите за поддръжка на бордната система за насочване трябва да бъдат въведени от оператора, във връзка с производителя и да включват програмата за поддръжка на самолета от оператора, предвидена в JAR-OPS 1.910, която трябва да бъде одобрена от Властите.
(ii)Одобрени летища и писти
(1)Комбинацията тип/бордно оборудване/комбинация на пистата за всеки самолет трябва да бъде проверена чрез успешно завършване на най-малко един подход за кацане и кацане в Категория ІІ или по-добри условия, преди да започнат експлоатации Категория ІІІ. |
420>