Факултет „природни науки и образование

Educational Psychologist, № 32, 1997, pp. 81-99.
82. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. 1989 http://www. Mathcurri culumcenter.org/PDFS/CCM/summaries/standards_summary.pdf (III, 2015).
83. Network Communicate Support Motivate (NCSM) Improving student achievement through designated district and school mathematics program leaders, 1998 http://midcentral-coop.org/uploads/Basic%20 Skills%20Position%
20Paper.pdf (II, 2015).
84. National Governors Association & Council of Chief State School Officers
(NGA&CCSSO), Common Core State Standards for mathematics, 2014 http://www.corestandards.org/wp-content/uploads/Math_Standards.pdf (I, 2015).

56
Десислава Георгиева
Автореферат на дисертационен труд, 2017
85. Niss, M., Hojgaard Т. Mathematical Competencies and the Learning of
Mathematics: The Danish KOM Project. // Stasey, K., Turner, R. (Eds.)
Assessing Mathematical Literacy the PISA Experience, 2015, pp. 35- 55.
86. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, PISA 2012
Assessment and Analytical Framework: Mathematics, Reading, Science,
Problem Solving and Financial Literacy, Paris, OECD Publishing, 2013, 265 p.
87. OECD, PISA 2012 Results in Focus what 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know, Schleicher, A. (Ed.), 2014, 44 p. www.OECD.org/pisa.
88. Panasuk, R., Beyranevand, M. Algebra students’ ability to recognize multiple representations and achievement. // International Journal for Math Teaching
and Learning, 2010, http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/panasuk.pdf (III, 2015).
89. Papan, N., Sompong, N. A Development of Training Model Based on
Constructivism Theory for Teachers under the Jurisdiction of the Basic,
International Educational Technology Conference. // Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences, 2012, vol 64, pp. 665 – 670.
90. Pinter, K. On Teaching Mathematical Problem-Solving and Problem Posing,
Abstract of a PhD thesis, Doctoral School in Mathematics and Computer
Science, University of Szeged, Faculty of Science and Informatics, Bolyai
Institute, Szeged, 2012, 22 p.
91. Ponte, J., Henriques, A. Problem posing based on investigation activities by university students // Educational Studies in Mathematics, Springer, Dordrecht
2013, vol. 83, pp. 145-156.
92. Silver, E. On mathematical problem posing. // For the learning of mathematics, vol. 14 (1) Vancouver, Canada: FL M Publishing Association, 1994, pp. 19–28.
93. Singer, F., Voica, C. A problem-solving conceptual framework and its implications in designing problem-posing tasks. // Educational Studies in
Mathematics, vol. 83, Springer, Dordrecht 2013, pp. 9-26.
94. Stoyanova, E. Extending and exploring students’ problem solving via problem posing. A thesis submitted to Edith Cowan University, Faculty of Education for the Degree of PhD in Education, 1997, 376 p.
95. Stoyanova, E. Elerton, N. A Framework for Research into Students' Problem
Posing in School Mathematics. // P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in mathematics
education. Melbourne: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia,
1996, pp. 518-525.
96. Von Glasersfeld, E. An introduction to radical constructivism // Watzlawick, P.
(Ed.) The invented reality. New York: Norton, 1984, pp. 17–40.
97. Von Glasersfeld, E. Learning as Constructive Activity. // Proceedings of the 5th
Annual Meeting of the North American Group of Psychology in Mathematics
Education, Montreal, vol. 1, 1983, pp. 41–101. http://www.univie.ac.at/constructivism/EvG/papers/083.pdf (X, 2014)
98. Wegerif, R. Literature Review in Thinking Skills, Technology and Learning.
Futurelab series, 2002, 50 p.
99. Wyatt-Smith, C., Elkins, J., & Gunn, S. (Eds.) Multiple Perspectives on
Difficulties in Learning Literacy and Numeracy. Dordrecht: Springer, 2011, 375 p.