The Task-based Asynchronous Pattern Stephen Toub, Microsoft

Размер284.15 Kb.
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

The Task-based Asynchronous Pattern

Stephen Toub, Microsoft
February 2012


Overview 2

The Task-based Asynchronous Pattern Defined 2

Naming, Parameters, and Return Types 2

Behavior 3

Optional: Cancellation 5

Optional: Progress Reporting 6

Choosing Which Overloads to Provide 8

Implementing the Task-based Asynchronous Pattern 9

Method Generation 9

Workloads 10

Consuming the Task-based Asynchronous Pattern 14

Await 14

Cancellation 16

Progress 17

Using the Built-in Task-based Combinators 17

Building Task-based Combinators 26

Building Task-based Data Structures 29

Interop with Other .NET Asynchronous Patterns and Types 32

Tasks and the Asynchronous Programming Model (APM) 32

Tasks and the Event-based Asynchronous Pattern (EAP) 34

Tasks and WaitHandles 35

Case Study: CopyToAsync 36


The Task-based Asynchronous Pattern (TAP) is a new pattern for asynchrony in the .NET Framework. It is based on the Task and Task types in the System.Threading.Tasks namespace, which are used to represent arbitrary asynchronous operations.

The Task-based Asynchronous Pattern Defined

Naming, Parameters, and Return Types

Initiation and completion of an asynchronous operation in the TAP are represented by a single method, and thus there is only one method to name. This is in contrast to the IAsyncResult pattern, or APM pattern, where BeginMethodName and EndMethodName methods are required, and in contrast to the event-based asynchronous pattern, or EAP, where a MethodNameAsync is required in addition to one or more events, event handler delegate types, and EventArg-derived types. Asynchronous methods in the TAP are named with an “Async” suffix that follows the operation’s name, e.g. MethodNameAsync. The singular TAP method returns either a Task or a Task, based on whether the corresponding synchronous method would return void or a type TResult, respectively. (If adding a TAP method to a class that already contains a method MethodNameAsync, the suffix “TaskAsync” may be used instead, resulting in “MethodNameTaskAsync”.)

For example, consider a “Read” method that reads a specified amount of data into a provided buffer starting at a specified offset:

public class MyClass


public int Read(byte [] buffer, int offset, int count);

The APM counterpart to this method would expose the following two methods:

public class MyClass


public IAsyncResult BeginRead(

byte [] buffer, int offset, int count,

AsyncCallback callback, object state);

public int EndRead(IAsyncResult asyncResult);

The EAP counterpart would expose the following set of types and members:

public class MyClass


public void ReadAsync(byte [] buffer, int offset, int count);

public event ReadCompletedEventHandler ReadCompleted;

public delegate void ReadCompletedEventHandler(

object sender, ReadCompletedEventArgs eventArgs);
public class ReadCompletedEventArgs : AsyncCompletedEventArgs


public int Result { get; }

The TAP counterpart would expose the following single method:

public class MyClass


public Task ReadAsync(byte [] buffer, int offset, int count);

The parameters to a basic TAP method should be the same parameters provided to the synchronous counterpart, in the same order. However, “out” and “ref” parameters are exempted from this rule and should be avoided entirely. Any data that would have been returned through an out or ref parameter should instead be returned as part of the returned Task’s Result, utilizing a tuple or a custom data structure in order to accommodate multiple values.

Methods devoted purely to the creation, manipulation, or combination of tasks (where the asynchronous intent of the method is clear in the method name or in the name of the type on which the method lives) need not follow the aforementioned naming pattern; such methods are often referred to as “combinators.” Examples of such methods include Task.WhenAll and Task.WhenAny, and are discussed in more depth later in this document.


Initiating the Asynchronous Operation

An asynchronous method based on the TAP is permitted to do a small amount of work synchronously before it returns the resulting Task. The work should be kept to the minimal amount necessary, performing operations such as validating arguments and initiating the asynchronous operation. It is likely that asynchronous methods will be invoked from user interface threads, and thus any long-running work in the synchronous up-front portion of an asynchronous method could harm responsiveness. It is also likely that multiple asynchronous methods will be launched concurrently, and thus any long-running work in the synchronous up-front portion of an asynchronous method could delay the initiation of other asynchronous operations, thereby decreasing benefits of concurrency.

In some cases, the amount of work required to complete the operation is less than the amount of work it would take to launch the operation asynchronously (e.g. reading from a stream where the read can be satisfied by data already buffered in memory). In such cases, the operation may complete synchronously, returning a Task that has already been completed.


An asynchronous method should only directly raise an exception to be thrown out of the MethodNameAsync call in response to a usage error*. For all other errors, exceptions occurring during the execution of an asynchronous method should be assigned to the returned Task. This is the case even if the asynchronous method happens to complete synchronously before the Task is returned. Typically, a Task will contain at most one exception. However, for cases where a Task is used to represent multiple operations (e.g. Task.WhenAll), multiple exceptions may be associated with a single Task.

(*Per .NET design guidelines, a usage error is something that can be avoided by changing the code that calls the method. For example, if an error state results when a null is passed as one of the method’s arguments, an error condition usually represented by an ArgumentNullException, the calling code can be modified by the developer to ensure that null is never passed. In other words, the developer can and should ensure that usage errors never occur in production code.)

Target Environment

It is up to the TAP method’s implementation to determine where asynchronous execution occurs. The developer of the TAP method may choose to execute the workload on the ThreadPool, may choose to implement it using asynchronous I/O and thus without being bound to a thread for the majority of the operation’s execution, may choose to run on a specific thread as need-be, such as the UI thread, or any number of other potential contexts. It may even be the case that a TAP method has no execution to perform, returning a Task that simply represents the occurrence of a condition elsewhere in the system (e.g. a Task that represents TData arriving at a queued data structure).

The caller of the TAP method may block waiting for the TAP method to complete (by synchronously waiting on the resulting Task), or may utilize a continuation to execute additional code when the asynchronous operation completes. The creator of the continuation has control over where that continuation code executes. These continuations may be created either explicitly through methods on the Task class (e.g. ContinueWith) or implicitly using language support built on top of continuations (e.g. “await” in C#, “Await” in Visual Basic, “AwaitValue” in F#).

Task Status

The Task class provides a life cycle for asynchronous operations, and that cycle is represented by the TaskStatus enumeration. In order to support corner cases of types deriving from Task and Task as well as the separation of construction from scheduling, the Task class exposes a Start method. Tasks created by its public constructors are referred to as “cold” tasks, in that they begin their life cycle in the non-scheduled TaskStatus.Created state, and it’s not until Start is called on these instances that they progress to being scheduled. All other tasks begin their life cycle in a “hot” state, meaning that the asynchronous operations they represent have already been initiated and their TaskStatus is an enumeration value other than Created.

All tasks returned from TAP methods must be “hot.” If a TAP method internally uses a Task’s constructor to instantiate the task to be returned, the TAP method must call Start on the Task object prior to returning it. Consumers of a TAP method may safely assume that the returned task is “hot,” and should not attempt to call Start on any Task returned from a TAP method. Calling Start on a “hot” task will result in an InvalidOperationException (this check is handled automatically by the Task class).

Сподели с приятели:
  1   2   3   4   5   6   7

© 2024
отнасят до администрацията

    Начална страница